Early Modern16 December 1773

Boston Tea Party (1773): The Protest That Led to Revolution

The Boston Tea Party of 16 December 1773 saw colonists dump 342 chests of tea into Boston Harbor. The Tea Act, the night itself and Britain's harsh response.

Hand-coloured 1846 lithograph by Nathaniel Currier showing men throwing chests of tea from a ship into Boston Harbor while a crowd watches
Hand-coloured 1846 lithograph by Nathaniel Currier showing men throwing chests of tea from a ship into Boston Harbor while a crowd watches. Image: Nathaniel Currier (Public domain), Wikimedia Commons
Contents

The Boston Tea Party was a political protest on the night of 16 December 1773, when colonists in Boston, Massachusetts, destroyed 342 chests of British East India Company tea by throwing them into the harbour. It was a direct challenge to Parliament’s claim to tax the American colonies. Britain’s punitive response pushed the colonies towards united resistance and, within eighteen months, to war.

Background: taxes, tea and representation

After the Seven Years’ War ended in 1763, Britain was deeply in debt and decided that the American colonies should help pay for their own defence. Parliament began to tax the colonies directly, first with the Stamp Act of 1765, which was repealed after fierce protests, and then with the Townshend Acts of 1767, which put duties on imported glass, lead, paint, paper and tea.

Colonists argued that only their own elected assemblies could tax them, since they had no members in Parliament. The slogan “no taxation without representation” summed up the case. Boycotts and unrest followed, including the shooting of civilians in the Boston Massacre of March 1770. That year Parliament repealed most of the Townshend duties but deliberately kept the one on tea, at three pence per pound, as a statement of its right to tax.

Many Americans responded by drinking smuggled Dutch tea. By the early 1770s the East India Company, which held the legal monopoly on British trade with Asia, had millions of pounds of unsold tea in its London warehouses and was close to financial collapse.

The Tea Act of 1773

The government of Lord North tried to rescue the company with the Tea Act, which received royal assent on 10 May 1773. It allowed the company to ship tea directly to America and sell it through a small number of chosen merchants, called consignees, without first auctioning it in London and paying British duties there.

The effect was to make legal tea cheaper in America than before, cheaper even than much of the smuggled tea. But the Townshend duty of three pence per pound was still to be paid on landing. Colonial leaders saw the cheap tea as a bait: if Americans bought it, they would be accepting Parliament’s right to tax them. Merchants, including smugglers who would lose business, also resented a monopoly that cut them out of the trade.

In the autumn of 1773 the company sent about 2,000 chests of tea to Boston, New York, Philadelphia and Charleston. In New York and Philadelphia, pressure on the consignees and threats against ship captains led the ships to turn back without unloading. In Charleston the tea was landed but locked away unsold. Boston was different, because Governor Thomas Hutchinson, whose own sons were among the consignees, refused to give way.

What happened in Boston

The first tea ship, the Dartmouth, arrived in Boston Harbor on 28 November 1773, followed in December by the Eleanor and the brig Beaver. A fourth ship, the William, ran aground off Cape Cod. Under customs law a cargo had to be unloaded and its duty paid within twenty days of arrival, or customs officials could seize it. For the Dartmouth, that deadline fell on 17 December.

Mass meetings organised by the Sons of Liberty and led by figures such as Samuel Adams demanded that the ships return to Britain with the tea still aboard. Volunteers guarded the wharf to stop any tea being landed. Hutchinson, however, refused to grant the ships a pass to leave the harbour without paying the duty, and British warships guarded the harbour entrance.

On 16 December 1773, thousands of people, commonly estimated at 5,000 to 7,000, gathered in and around the Old South Meeting House. The Dartmouth’s owner, the young Quaker merchant Francis Rotch, was sent to Hutchinson’s country house in Milton for one last request. Late in the afternoon he returned to report that the governor had again refused.

That evening a group of men, many crudely disguised as Mohawk Indians with blankets and soot or paint on their faces, went to Griffin’s Wharf. Estimates of their number range from about 30 to more than 100, with many more watching from the shore. They boarded the three ships and over roughly three hours hoisted 342 chests on deck, split them open with axes and tipped the tea into the water.

The protest was orderly by design. The participants damaged nothing else, replaced a broken padlock, and reportedly punished one man who tried to pocket tea for himself. Royal troops and warships nearby did not intervene. The next morning, tea was still floating in the harbour, and men in boats pushed it under to make sure it was ruined.

Key people

Samuel Adams was a leading Boston politician and organiser of the Sons of Liberty. He chaired meetings during the crisis, though historians debate how far he directly planned the destruction of the tea.

Thomas Hutchinson, the royal governor of Massachusetts, was born in Boston but firmly upheld Parliament’s authority. His refusal to let the ships leave made a confrontation almost unavoidable.

Lord North, prime minister from 1770, designed the Tea Act as a financial rescue for the East India Company and later led the punitive response.

John Hancock, one of the richest merchants in Boston, was a prominent patriot leader and opponent of the tea monopoly. Francis Rotch was the owner caught in the middle, who tried until the last hour to find a legal way out.

Most of the men who actually destroyed the tea were artisans, apprentices and labourers who kept their identities secret for years. One of them, the shoemaker George Robert Twelves Hewes, later gave detailed accounts that are a key source for the night.

Britain’s response

News reached London in January 1774. Even many British politicians who had sympathised with the colonists saw the destruction of private property as going too far. Parliament answered with a series of laws known as the Coercive Acts, which colonists called the Intolerable Acts.

The first, the Boston Port Act, received royal assent on 31 March 1774. It closed Boston Harbor to commerce from 1 June 1774 until the East India Company and customs officials had been compensated. Further acts restricted town meetings and elected government in Massachusetts and made it easier to station troops in the colonies. General Thomas Gage, commander of British forces in North America, was made governor of Massachusetts.

Britain meant to isolate Boston, but the measures had the opposite effect. Other colonies sent food and money to the city and agreed to meet together, leading to the First Continental Congress in Philadelphia in September 1774.

Consequences and legacy

The Boston Tea Party turned a quarrel over tea duties into a direct test of power between Parliament and the colonies. By punishing an entire city, the British government convinced many moderate colonists that their liberties were in danger. Within sixteen months, British troops and Massachusetts militia were fighting at Lexington and Concord.

The day after the protest, John Adams wrote in his diary that “This is the most magnificent Movement of all,” judging that the destruction of the tea was bold and would have lasting consequences. The tea itself was never paid for by Boston.

The episode became one of the best-known stories in American history and a lasting symbol of protest against government taxation. A replica ship museum now stands near the original site, which lies under land later reclaimed from the harbour.

Myths and facts

Myth: colonists rebelled against a big rise in the price of tea. In fact, the Tea Act lowered the price of legal tea. The objection was to the tax principle and the company’s monopoly.

Myth: the protesters were convincingly disguised as Native Americans. The “Mohawk” costumes were improvised and partly symbolic, a way of hiding identities and presenting the act as American rather than British. Onlookers knew they were colonists.

Myth: the event was always called the Boston Tea Party. The name came into general use only in the 1820s and 1830s, when surviving participants were celebrated.

By the numbers

MeasureFigure
Ships boarded3 (Dartmouth, Eleanor, Beaver)
Chests destroyed342
Weight of teaabout 92,000 lb (roughly 46 tonnes)
Value at the timearound £9,000–£10,000
Participants boarding the shipsestimated 30 to over 100
Duty on tea3 pence per pound

Timeline

  • 1767, June–July: Parliament passes the Townshend Acts, including a duty on tea.
  • 1770, April: Most Townshend duties are repealed, but the tea duty remains.
  • 1773, 10 May: The Tea Act receives royal assent.
  • 1773, 28 November: The tea ship Dartmouth arrives in Boston Harbor.
  • 1773, 16 December: After a mass meeting at the Old South Meeting House, colonists destroy 342 chests of tea at Griffin’s Wharf.
  • 1774, 31 March: The Boston Port Act becomes law.
  • 1774, 1 June: Boston Harbor is closed to trade.
  • 1774, 5 September: The First Continental Congress meets in Philadelphia.

Why it matters

The Boston Tea Party was the moment when colonial resistance moved from boycotts to open defiance. Britain’s decision to punish Massachusetts collectively united the colonies against Parliament and set them on the road to the American Revolution.

Frequently asked questions

What happened at the Boston Tea Party?

On the evening of 16 December 1773, a group of Boston colonists, some thinly disguised as Mohawk Indians, boarded three ships at Griffin's Wharf. Over about three hours they broke open 342 chests of East India Company tea and dumped the contents into Boston Harbor.

Why did the colonists dump the tea?

They objected to the Tea Act of 1773, which kept a tax on tea that Parliament had imposed without colonial consent and gave the East India Company a privileged route into the American market. Paying the duty on this tea would, in their view, have accepted Parliament's right to tax the colonies.

Did the Tea Act raise the price of tea?

No. The Tea Act actually made legal East India Company tea cheaper, even cheaper than much smuggled Dutch tea. The protest was about the principle of taxation without representation and about the company's monopoly, not about higher prices.

How much tea was destroyed in the Boston Tea Party?

The protesters destroyed 342 chests holding roughly 92,000 pounds (about 46 tonnes) of tea. Its value at the time is usually given as around £9,000–£10,000.

How did Britain respond to the Boston Tea Party?

Parliament passed the Coercive Acts in 1774, beginning with the Boston Port Act, which closed the harbour from 1 June 1774 until the tea was paid for. Further acts curbed self-government in Massachusetts, and colonists called the whole package the Intolerable Acts.

Was it called the Boston Tea Party at the time?

No. Contemporaries usually spoke of the destruction of the tea. The name Boston Tea Party only became common several decades later, in the 1820s and 1830s.

Sources and further reading

  • Benjamin W. Labaree, The Boston Tea Party (Oxford University Press, 1964)
  • Benjamin L. Carp, Defiance of the Patriots: The Boston Tea Party and the Making of America (Yale University Press, 2010)
  • Encyclopaedia Britannica, "Boston Tea Party"
  • Robert Middlekauff, The Glorious Cause: The American Revolution, 1763-1789 (Oxford University Press)

Cite this article

“Boston Tea Party (1773): The Protest That Led to Revolution.” Chronicle, https://chronicle.bigworldlist.com/articles/boston-tea-party-1773/.