Early Modern14 January 1761

Third Battle of Panipat (1761): Marathas Versus Ahmad Shah

On 14 January 1761 Ahmad Shah Durrani crushed the Maratha army at Panipat near Delhi. Causes, the siege, the battle, the death toll and its effect on India.

Faizabad-style Indian drawing of about 1770 showing the armies at the Third Battle of Panipat, with mounted commanders and lines of cavalry and infantry
Faizabad-style Indian drawing of about 1770 showing the armies at the Third Battle of Panipat, with mounted commanders and lines of cavalry and infantry. Image: Unknown Indian artist (c. 1770) (Public domain), Wikimedia Commons
Contents

The Third Battle of Panipat, fought on 14 January 1761 near the town of Panipat north of Delhi, was one of the largest and bloodiest battles of the 18th century. The Afghan ruler Ahmad Shah Durrani, supported by Indian Muslim allies, destroyed the army of the Maratha Confederacy. The defeat ended Maratha hopes of dominating northern India for a decade and opened the way for new powers, above all the British East India Company.

Background: a power vacuum in northern India

By the mid-18th century the Mughal Empire was a shadow of its former self. After the death of Aurangzeb in 1707 and the sack of Delhi by Nader Shah in 1739, provincial governors had become independent rulers, and the emperor in Delhi controlled little beyond the city. Two outside powers moved to fill the gap.

From the Deccan came the Marathas. Since the time of Shivaji, Maratha power had grown into a confederacy led by the Peshwa, the chief minister based at Pune, with great commanders such as the Holkars and Scindias (Shindes) holding their own territories. By the 1750s Maratha armies collected tribute across much of India and had become the real protectors of the Mughal emperor.

From the north-west came Ahmad Shah Durrani, also known as Ahmad Shah Abdali, who had founded an Afghan empire in 1747. He invaded India repeatedly and in 1757 sacked Delhi. He left his son Timur Shah to govern the Punjab, but in 1758 a Maratha army under Raghunathrao drove the Afghans out and took Lahore. The rivalry for the Punjab made a major clash almost inevitable.

The road to Panipat

Ahmad Shah returned in late 1759. His Indian ally Najib ud-Daula, a Rohilla Afghan chief who dominated Delhi’s politics, helped him gather support. In January 1760 the Afghans killed the Maratha commander Dattaji Scindia at Barari Ghat near Delhi.

In response the Peshwa, Balaji Bajirao, sent a large army north under his cousin Sadashivrao Bhau. His own teenage son and heir, Vishwasrao, went with it as nominal commander. The army included a disciplined infantry and artillery corps trained in European methods and led by Ibrahim Khan Gardi, who had served the French.

The Bhau occupied Delhi in August 1760. Short of money, his troops stripped the silver ceiling of the Diwan-i-Khas, the hall of private audience in the Red Fort. In October the Marathas stormed the Afghan-held fort of Kunjpura on the Yamuna river.

Ahmad Shah then made a bold move. In late October 1760 he crossed the Yamuna at Baghpat, south of the Maratha army, and placed himself between the Marathas and their bases in the south. Shuja-ud-Daula, the nawab of Awadh, had by now joined the Afghans, persuaded largely by Najib.

The siege at Panipat

The Marathas dug in at Panipat, building a fortified camp with trenches and artillery. Ahmad Shah camped a few kilometres to the south. For about two months the armies faced each other, fighting skirmishes but avoiding a full battle.

Time worked for the Afghans. Their light cavalry cut the Maratha supply routes, and in December 1760 they killed Govind Pant Bundele, the official responsible for bringing money and grain to the Maratha camp. The Maratha camp held not only soldiers but a vast crowd of non-combatants: servants, traders, families and pilgrims who had come north to visit Hindu holy places. By January food and fodder had run out, and men and animals were starving.

Other northern powers stayed away. The Jat ruler Suraj Mal and the Rajput princes refused to commit to the Marathas, partly because of earlier disputes over tribute. With no relief coming, the Bhau decided to break out.

The battle of 14 January 1761

Early on the morning of 14 January 1761 the Maratha army marched out of its camp in battle order. On the left, Ibrahim Khan Gardi’s infantry and guns attacked the Rohilla troops of Najib ud-Daula and Hafiz Rahmat Khan and inflicted heavy losses. In the centre the Bhau’s cavalry charged the division led by Ahmad Shah’s chief minister, Shah Wali Khan, and drove it back.

For several hours the battle hung in the balance. Ahmad Shah watched from behind his lines and gradually committed his reserves. He sent fresh troops forward and used camel-mounted swivel guns, called zamburaks, against the tired Maratha horsemen.

In the early afternoon Vishwasrao was killed by a bullet. The Bhau, on learning of his death, plunged into the fighting and was killed as well; his body was later identified on the field. Some commanders, including Malhar Rao Holkar, withdrew their contingents. The Maratha army then broke, and the Afghan cavalry pursued the fleeing troops and camp followers late into the day.

The aftermath and the death toll

The slaughter continued after the battle. Large numbers of fugitives were cut down in the pursuit or killed by local villagers, and many prisoners were executed the following day. Ibrahim Khan Gardi was captured and put to death. The young Jankoji Scindia was also killed after capture, while his relative Mahadji Scindia escaped badly wounded.

Exact figures do not exist, and the numbers in different sources vary widely. The table below gives commonly cited ranges.

MeasureCommonly cited estimate
Maratha fighting troopsabout 45,000–60,000
Non-combatants with the Maratha armyabout 100,000 or more (estimates vary widely)
Afghan and allied troopsabout 40,000–60,000, with Indian allies adding further thousands
Deaths in battle and pursuittens of thousands; totals of 60,000–100,000 or more including non-combatants

The news reached the Peshwa in a message that, according to a well-known tradition, spoke of two pearls dissolved and countless coins lost, a coded way of reporting the deaths of his son and cousin and the loss of the army. Balaji Bajirao died in June 1761, his health reportedly broken by the disaster.

Ahmad Shah’s own losses were heavy, and his troops were restless after months in India. He did not try to rule Delhi. He recognised the exiled Mughal prince Shah Alam II as emperor, left Najib ud-Daula in control of Delhi and returned to Afghanistan in the spring of 1761.

Key people

  • Ahmad Shah Durrani (c. 1722–1772): founder of the Durrani Empire and the victorious commander.
  • Sadashivrao Bhau (1730–1761): cousin of the Peshwa and commander of the Maratha army, killed in the battle.
  • Vishwasrao (1742–1761): the Peshwa’s eldest son and heir, nominal head of the expedition, killed in the battle.
  • Najib ud-Daula (died 1770): Rohilla chief who invited Ahmad Shah and organised his Indian allies.
  • Ibrahim Khan Gardi (died 1761): commander of the Maratha artillery and European-style infantry.

Consequences

Panipat did not destroy the Marathas. Under the young Peshwa Madhavrao I they recovered within a decade, and in 1771–72 Mahadji Scindia escorted Shah Alam II back to Delhi. But the loss of a generation of leaders weakened the central authority of the Peshwa, and the great Maratha chiefs became increasingly independent of Pune.

The Afghans gained little lasting territory. The Sikhs, whom Ahmad Shah fought repeatedly in the 1760s, took over most of the Punjab as Afghan control faded. In the east the British East India Company, already master of Bengal after Plassey in 1757, defeated the Mughal emperor and the nawab of Awadh at Buxar in 1764. With the Marathas temporarily weakened, no Indian power was able to check this expansion, and the Company later defeated the Marathas in the wars that ended with the Third Anglo-Maratha War.

Legacy and myths

In Marathi the phrase “to meet one’s Panipat” became an expression for a crushing disaster. The battle has inspired novels, plays and films, and a memorial now stands at Kala Amb, the traditional site of the fighting. For Afghans it remains one of Ahmad Shah’s greatest victories.

A popular belief is that Panipat directly handed India to the British. The link is real but indirect: the Marathas remained a major power for another half-century, and the British victory depended on many other factors. Another simplification portrays the battle as a purely religious war; in fact both sides included Hindus and Muslims, and Ibrahim Khan Gardi, a Muslim, was one of the Marathas’ most important commanders.

Timeline

  • 1758: A Maratha army takes Lahore and drives the Afghans out of the Punjab.
  • 1760, January: Dattaji Scindia is killed by Afghan troops at Barari Ghat.
  • 1760, August: Sadashivrao Bhau occupies Delhi.
  • 1760, October: The Marathas take Kunjpura; Ahmad Shah crosses the Yamuna at Baghpat.
  • 1760, November–December: The armies entrench at Panipat; Afghan raids cut Maratha supplies.
  • 1761, 14 January: The battle; Vishwasrao and Sadashivrao Bhau are killed and the Maratha army is destroyed.
  • 1761, March: Ahmad Shah leaves for Afghanistan after recognising Shah Alam II.
  • 1761, June: The Peshwa Balaji Bajirao dies at Pune.
  • 1771: Mahadji Scindia restores Maratha influence at Delhi.

Why it matters

The Third Battle of Panipat was a turning point in 18th-century India. It ended the Maratha drive for supremacy in the north at the moment when Mughal power had collapsed, and it left a gap that the British East India Company was ready to exploit. Panipat itself had already seen two decisive battles, in 1526 and 1556, and the third confirmed its reputation as the gateway to Delhi.

Frequently asked questions

Who won the Third Battle of Panipat?

Ahmad Shah Durrani, the Afghan ruler, won the battle with the support of the Rohilla chief Najib ud-Daula and Shuja-ud-Daula of Awadh. The Maratha army under Sadashivrao Bhau was destroyed.

When was the Third Battle of Panipat fought?

The battle was fought on 14 January 1761, after the two armies had faced each other near Panipat for about two months. Some older works give 13 January, but 14 January is the date generally accepted.

How many people died at Panipat in 1761?

Exact figures are unknown. Most historians estimate that tens of thousands of Maratha soldiers died in the battle and the pursuit, and that total deaths, including camp followers and prisoners killed afterwards, may have reached 60,000 to 100,000 or more.

Why did the Marathas lose at Panipat?

The Maratha army was cut off from its supply lines, starving and burdened by a huge crowd of non-combatants. It also lacked support from northern Indian rulers, and the death of the Peshwa's son Vishwasrao and of Sadashivrao Bhau during the fighting caused the army to collapse.

What was the result of the Third Battle of Panipat?

Maratha power in northern India was badly weakened for about ten years, and Ahmad Shah returned to Afghanistan without trying to rule India. The vacuum helped the British East India Company and the Sikhs to expand their power.

Where is Panipat?

Panipat is a city in the modern Indian state of Haryana, about 90 kilometres north of Delhi. It lies on the historic route from the north-west into the Ganges plain and was the site of major battles in 1526, 1556 and 1761.

Sources and further reading

  • Jadunath Sarkar, Fall of the Mughal Empire, Volume 2
  • T. S. Shejwalkar, Panipat: 1761
  • Stewart Gordon, The Marathas 1600-1818 (The New Cambridge History of India)
  • Encyclopaedia Britannica, "Battles of Panipat"

Cite this article

“Third Battle of Panipat (1761): Marathas Versus Ahmad Shah.” Chronicle, https://chronicle.bigworldlist.com/articles/third-battle-of-panipat-1761/.