Contemporary2003–2010s
War in Darfur (2003): Janjaweed Atrocities and Genocide Charges
The War in Darfur began in 2003 when rebels rose against Sudan's government. Janjaweed militia attacks, mass displacement and the ICC case against al-Bashir.

Contents
The War in Darfur is an armed conflict in western Sudan that began in February 2003, when rebel movements rose against the government of President Omar al-Bashir. Khartoum’s response, which relied heavily on air power and on Arab militias known as the Janjaweed, led to the destruction of thousands of villages, the displacement of more than two million people and an estimated death toll in the hundreds of thousands. The war made Darfur a byword for mass atrocity and produced the first arrest warrant issued by the International Criminal Court (ICC) against a sitting head of state.
Background
Darfur, a region roughly the size of France, was an independent sultanate until it was absorbed into Anglo-Egyptian Sudan in 1916. Its population is overwhelmingly Muslim but ethnically diverse. Settled farming peoples such as the Fur and Masalit, the semi-nomadic Zaghawa and a number of Arabic-speaking herding groups had long shared the land, with disputes over grazing and water usually settled by local leaders.
From the 1970s onward that balance came under strain. Recurrent drought and the spread of the desert pushed northern herders south onto farmland, while the region’s population grew fast. Darfur also became caught up in the wars of neighbouring Chad and in Libyan ambitions in the Sahel, which brought weapons and armed men into the area. A violent conflict between Fur and Arab groups in 1987–1989 foreshadowed what was to come.
Many Darfuris also felt neglected by the central government. Roads, schools and hospitals were scarce, and political power was concentrated among a small elite from the Nile valley. In 2000 an anonymous document known as the “Black Book” circulated in Sudan, arguing in detail that the state was dominated by a narrow group from the north. At the same time, peace talks to end the long war in southern Sudan offered a model in which armed rebellion seemed to win a share of power and wealth.
The rebellion and the government response
In February 2003 the Sudan Liberation Army (SLA), led by Abdul Wahid al-Nur, Minni Minnawi and others, began attacking government posts. A second group, the Justice and Equality Movement (JEM), led by Khalil Ibrahim, joined the fight. On 25 April 2003 rebels attacked the airport at El Fasher, the capital of North Darfur, destroying military aircraft and capturing an air force general. The raid humiliated the army and convinced Khartoum that it needed a different strategy.
Short of reliable troops, many of whom were themselves from Darfur, the government turned to militias drawn mainly from Arab herding communities. These fighters, popularly called the Janjaweed (a term often translated as “devils on horseback”), were armed, paid and given legal impunity. One of their best-known leaders was Musa Hilal, a chief of the Mahamid Rizeigat.
From mid-2003 the pattern of attack became grimly familiar. Government aircraft, often Antonov transport planes used as crude bombers, struck villages, after which militia on horses and camels, sometimes alongside regular troops, moved in. Men were killed, women and girls were raped, livestock was taken, wells were poisoned and homes were burned. The victims were overwhelmingly from the Fur, Masalit and Zaghawa communities, groups seen as supporting the rebels.
Humanitarian crisis
By 2004 Darfur was described by UN officials as one of the world’s worst humanitarian crises. Survivors fled to towns and to vast camps for internally displaced people, such as Kalma near Nyala and Zamzam near El Fasher. Others crossed the border into eastern Chad, where refugee camps eventually held well over 200,000 Darfuris.
Disease, malnutrition and lack of water caused many deaths in the camps, alongside deaths from direct violence. The government restricted access for aid workers and journalists for long periods, which made accurate counts impossible. In 2008 the UN’s humanitarian chief estimated that up to 300,000 people had died, while the Sudanese government insisted the toll was around 10,000. Most researchers accept figures between about 200,000 and 400,000 for the main years of the conflict.
Genocide debate and international response
On 9 September 2004 US Secretary of State Colin Powell told the Senate that genocide had been committed in Darfur, the first time a US administration had applied the term to an ongoing conflict. A UN International Commission of Inquiry, chaired by the Italian jurist Antonio Cassese, reported in January 2005 that government forces and militias had committed serious crimes, including murder, torture and rape, that might amount to crimes against humanity. It did not find that the government as such had pursued a policy of genocide, though it said individuals might have acted with genocidal intent.
Peacekeeping began modestly. The African Union deployed a small monitoring force in 2004, which grew into the African Union Mission in Sudan (AMIS) but remained under-equipped. In July 2007 the UN Security Council authorised a joint UN-African Union operation, UNAMID, which took over at the end of that year and became one of the largest peacekeeping missions in the world. It finally ended on 31 December 2020.
In public opinion, especially in the United States and Europe, Darfur became a major cause. Student campaigns, the Save Darfur Coalition and well-known figures pressed governments to act, and the issue drew comparisons with the failure to stop the Rwandan genocide a decade earlier.
Peace efforts
Several agreements tried to end the fighting. The Darfur Peace Agreement signed at Abuja, Nigeria, on 5 May 2006 was accepted only by the government and Minni Minnawi’s SLA faction, and the other rebels fought on. The rebel movements splintered into many factions, which made negotiation harder, and violence also broke out between Arab groups and among former allies.
In May 2008 JEM fighters launched a surprise raid on Omdurman, across the Nile from Khartoum, before being driven back. A further accord, the Doha Document for Peace in Darfur, was signed in July 2011 with a coalition of smaller groups. Large-scale fighting declined after around 2010, but insecurity, displacement and periodic attacks continued throughout the decade.
The ICC case
On 31 March 2005 the UN Security Council referred the situation in Darfur to the International Criminal Court, the first such referral in the court’s history. In 2007 the ICC issued arrest warrants for Ahmed Haroun, a former minister of state for the interior, and for the militia leader Ali Kushayb.
On 4 March 2009 the court issued an arrest warrant for President Omar al-Bashir for war crimes and crimes against humanity. A second warrant on 12 July 2010 added three counts of genocide. He was the first sitting head of state to be sought by the ICC. Al-Bashir rejected the court’s authority and travelled to a number of friendly states without being arrested. He was overthrown by the army on 11 April 2019 after months of street protests, but Sudan has not surrendered him to The Hague.
Ali Kushayb gave himself up in 2020, and his trial opened in 2022. In October 2025 the court found him guilty of war crimes and crimes against humanity, the first conviction arising from the Darfur situation.
Timeline
- 2003, February: The Sudan Liberation Army begins armed attacks in Darfur.
- 2003, 25 April: Rebels attack El Fasher airport, prompting a major government counter-offensive.
- 2004, 9 September: US Secretary of State Colin Powell describes the killings as genocide.
- 2005, 31 March: The UN Security Council refers Darfur to the International Criminal Court.
- 2006, 5 May: The Darfur Peace Agreement is signed in Abuja by the government and one rebel faction.
- 2007, 31 July: The Security Council authorises the UNAMID peacekeeping mission.
- 2009, 4 March: The ICC issues its first arrest warrant for President Omar al-Bashir.
- 2010, 12 July: A second warrant adds charges of genocide.
- 2019, 11 April: Al-Bashir is removed from power by the Sudanese military.
- 2020, 31 December: UNAMID’s mandate ends.
Legacy
The Janjaweed did not simply disappear. Many of their fighters were later folded into the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), a paramilitary force created in 2013 under Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, known as Hemedti. When war broke out between the RSF and the Sudanese army in April 2023, Darfur again saw mass killings and displacement, particularly of the Masalit in West Darfur, prompting renewed investigations by the ICC.
The conflict also shaped wider debates. It was an early test of the “responsibility to protect” principle adopted by the UN in 2005 and of the ICC’s ability to reach heads of state. It ran in parallel with the peace process that led to South Sudan’s independence in 2011, and Sudan’s leaders were often accused of using southern peace talks to deflect pressure over Darfur.
Why it matters
Darfur showed how local disputes over land, water and power can be turned into mass violence when a state arms one community against others. It brought international criminal justice to bear on a sitting president for the first time, yet also revealed the limits of that justice when governments refuse to cooperate. For millions of Darfuris, the displacement that began in 2003 has never fully ended.
Frequently asked questions
What started the War in Darfur?
In February 2003 two rebel groups, the Sudan Liberation Army and the Justice and Equality Movement, took up arms against the government in Khartoum, accusing it of neglecting and oppressing Darfur's non-Arab communities. The government responded with air strikes and by arming Arab militias known as the Janjaweed.
Who were the Janjaweed?
The Janjaweed were militias recruited mainly from Arab nomadic groups in Darfur and armed and supported by the Sudanese government. They carried out raids on villages of the Fur, Masalit and Zaghawa peoples, killing civilians, committing sexual violence and burning homes.
How many people died in the Darfur conflict?
Figures are disputed. The United Nations estimated in 2008 that up to 300,000 people had died from violence, disease and hunger, while the Sudanese government put the toll at around 10,000. More than two million people were driven from their homes.
Was Darfur officially a genocide?
The United States government described the killings as genocide in September 2004. A UN commission of inquiry in 2005 found crimes against humanity and war crimes but did not conclude that the government had pursued a policy of genocide; the International Criminal Court later charged Omar al-Bashir with genocide in 2010.
Was Omar al-Bashir ever tried by the ICC?
No. The ICC issued arrest warrants for al-Bashir in 2009 and 2010, but he continued to travel and govern until he was overthrown in April 2019. He has not been handed over to the court.
Is the Darfur conflict over?
Violence declined after about 2010, and the UN-African Union peacekeeping mission ended in 2020. However, fighting returned to Darfur on a large scale during the Sudanese civil war that began in April 2023.
Sources and further reading
- Encyclopaedia Britannica, "Darfur"
- Gérard Prunier, Darfur: The Ambiguous Genocide (Cornell University Press)
- Julie Flint and Alex de Waal, Darfur: A New History of a Long War (Zed Books)
- Report of the International Commission of Inquiry on Darfur to the United Nations Secretary-General (2005)
Cite this article
“War in Darfur (2003): Janjaweed Atrocities and Genocide Charges.” Chronicle, https://chronicle.bigworldlist.com/articles/war-in-darfur-2003/.